Estwald
1 min readFeb 10, 2024

--

Threatening? Are you joking?😎

It appears to me that you are under the impression that by expressing anger you will induce men to undergo a radical transformation and conform their conduct, their thoughts, and the content of their conversations to your expectations. That is a predictably unlikely response to your anger.

I don't particularly care if you are angry. If you believe that expressing anger will produce the outcome that you are seeking then continue to express anger. You are free to be angry; you are not obliged to justify it to me.

I would entirely ignore feminists' anger if I did not find it so amusing. I don't believe that your aim is to amuse me. But, that is the result that you have achieved.

One can easily predict that expressing anger is unlikely to induce the radical transformation in men's attitudes and behaviors that you appear to expect.

If you consider that a threat, I am sorry, but it is also the truth.

"Could that be the aforementioned female anger?"

There is no "female anger." What we are discussing is feminists' anger. Most women I know are not chronically angry.

--

--

Estwald
Estwald

Written by Estwald

Good Natured Curmudgeon-Which reality is the real reality?

Responses (1)