A man meets a 25-year-old woman. He tells her that he is thirty when he is actually forty. They have sex, which she thoroughly enjoys. Afterward, they go their separate ways leaving her with fond memories of the encounter. She has been raped but doesn't know it?

Several years later, the same two people happen to encounter each other. She still has fond memories of their previous encounter. During this meeting, she discovers that he is ten years older than he previously claimed. Should she be entitled to have him prosecuted for rape? Would the same answer apply (under the same circumstances) if she found out 24 hours after their original encounter?

-----------------------------------------------

A poor working man has a wealthy friend. His rich friend invites him to an exclusive affair where the rest of the male guests are wealthy. The rich man loans his poor friend a very expensive car and a $10,000 tuxedo. At the event, the poor man encounters a woman who expresses that she finds him very attractive and invites him to take her to a private location, in the expensive car that she observed him arrive in, for sex.

Afterward, she discovers that the expensive clothing and car are borrowed and that he is not wealthy. She is disappointed because her true motive in offering sex was to gain access to his wealth (that he does not have). She didn't really find him all that attractive. Is he a rapist because he deceptively and intentionally appeared to be wealthy? Is she a rapist because she lied about her attraction to him? Is it a case of mutual rape?

In general, in a case where both parties lied to each other, who is the rapist?

Lastly, there is the classic question: If both parties are too intoxicated to consent and both regret the experience afterward, then who is the rapist?